Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railway Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the third district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

BlacKburn, J.:

This suit was brought by respondent for personal injuries received while in the employ of the defendant company. The evidence shows that he was engaged as a helper in the machine-shop, and had been for several years. His foreman directed him to assist in taking down some shafting in the blacksmith shop and adjoining building. He did not work in that building. This work was to be done after regular working hours. He said he was tired and did not want to work extra hours, but he was urged by his foreman, and consented. It was dark when the work was to be done, and the negligence…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mangum v. Bullion, Beck & Champion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Wright v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Jacobson v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Mickelson v. New East Tintic Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Fowler v. Union Portland Cement Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API