People v. De Soto
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALKER, J.
A defendant cannot for the first time on appeal challenge the manner in which the sentencing judge exercises discretion in making sentencing choices or articulates his or her supporting reasons. (People v. Scott (1994) 9 Cal.4th 331 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 627, 885 P.2d 1040] (Scott).) In this case we consider whether defense counsel’s “boilerplate” objections to the sentence pronounced by the court are sufficient to avoid the claim of waiver of error on appeal. We conclude that defendant’s objections regarding claimed sentencing mistakes must be sufficiently specific and meaningful…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ErdelenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. ZunigaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. MinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. v. BaassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.