Legal Opinion

ATC Healthcare, Inc. v. Goldstein Golub Kessler, LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court is vested with broad discretion over the management of discovery and its determinations will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see 306 *821Rutledge, LLC v City of New York, 90 AD3d 1026 [2011]; Clark v Halmar Equities, Inc., 88 AD3d 940 [2011]). Under the circumstances of this case, we discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s discretionary determination to apportion the costs of scanning the plaintiffs document production into a litigation database at 40% to the plaintiff and 60% to the defendant.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 306 Rutledge, LLC v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Clark v. Halmar Equities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howard v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Howard v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API