Legal Opinion
Fauntleroy v. Rainbow Marketers
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 2004No. 04-926PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
hAMY, Judge.
The plaintiff, a former employee of the defendant, filed suit for wrongful termination and benefits under the federal Family Medical Leave Act and Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. The trial court found in favor of the defendant, concluding that the plaintiff had not met her burden of proof as to certain elements of her claims. The plaintiff now appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
Devonna Fauntleroy alleged in her “Petition for Damages Pre-Trial Brief’1 that she was employed by Rainbow Marketers, Inc. (“Rainbow”) from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Williams v. Delta Haven, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Newsom v. Global Data Systems, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Edwards v. Ford Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Crescent City Motors, L.L.C. v. RafidiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jared Pavlu v. Global Data Systems, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Matthew Newsom v. Global Data Systems, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.