Legal Opinion
Smith v. Huntington
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 15, 1790PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Action for a fraud in the purchase of a debt which íteuben Huntington owed him, for much less than the just value. "Joshua Coit, Esq. who was attorney for the plaintiff, and had discretionary powers, and transacted the business for the plaintiff, was admitted a witness;'upon objection made, a deposition drawn up by one Ambrose Spencer, agent for the plaintiff, was ruled out by the court.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Jones v. HakeNew York Supreme Court · 1800
- Dodd v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Glanton v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848