Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Commercial Credit Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1946No. 8620, 8621Published

1Opinion

Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing.

Mr. Chief Justice Lindquist

delivered the supplemental opinion.

On rehearing the appellants contend, that the repossession of the automobile on July 25, 1942, after the default of Hampton, completely terminated the conditional sale contract and that, consequently, the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act as amended October 6, 1942, 50 U. S. C. A. Appendix, sec. 501 et seq., has no application.

With this contention we cannot agree.

After the repossession of the automobile the contract (subject to applicable statutes) still measured the rights and remedies of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. BallanfonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Blodgett v. Merritt Annex Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API