Legal Opinion

Albany-Plattsburgh United Corp. v. Bell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be modified, without costs, by denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and remitting to Supreme *950Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.

The part of the controversy before us concentrates on the status of defendant Bell’s shareholder appraisal rights in Norpco Restaurant, Inc. It arises out of the purported merger of Norpco into plaintiff Albany-Plattsburgh United Corporation (APUC).

Appellant Bell was a minority shareholder in two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Albany-Plattsburgh United Corp. v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albany-Plattsburgh United Corp. v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Bell v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API