Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Welden National Bank

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 11, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The plaintiff claims that the only question presented by this record is whether a State court has jurisdiction of a claim for usury paid to a national bank; the defendant insists that the only question in the case is whether a recovery of such usury can be had under a state statute. The bill of exceptions sustains the defendant’s claim. It says: “This is an action brought under section 2845 of the General Laws of Vermont for.the recovery of usury.” This statement is binding upon ns. It determines the character of the action and governs our consideration of it. Halloran v. New England T. & T.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Davis v. RandallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Halloran v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  4. Central National Bank v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Legier v. DeveneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API