Biafore v. Kitchin Equipment Co. of Virginia, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENTON, J.
The commission suspended Ronald L. Biafore’s compensation because he refused surgery that the commission found to be reasonable and necessary. Biafore contends on this appeal that the commission erred (1) in finding that he could not refuse surgery proposed by the employer’s examining physician, and (2) in focusing upon whether the surgery was reasonable and necessary, instead of whether his refusal was unjustified. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision to suspend compensation and remand this case to the commission for reconsideration.
I
The evidence proved that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jensen Press v. AleCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- Breckenridge v. Marval Poultry Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Davis v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
- Shenandoah Products, Inc. v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Holland v. Virginia Bridge & Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- K & K Repairs & Construction, Inc. v. EndicottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- TURNER GILBANE JV v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Ragland v. MUGURUZACourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Schwab Construction v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- The Southland Corp, t/a 7-Eleven v. Sharon WelchCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.