Legal Opinion

Andricks v. Schaefer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1955No. 12886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal because no appeal bond, was filed. Appellants, Andricks and others, contend that as members of the Planning Commission of the City of San Antonio they are not required to give an appeal bond. Articles 1174 and 2072, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.Stats.

The decree appealed from provides that:

•‘‘It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue directing and commanding the defendants, Reynolds Andricks, J. A. West, George Delavan, Phillip L. Willis, John Toudouze, John T. Wilkins, Frank M. Valdez, E. T. Johnson and Samuel D.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hager v. State Ex Rel. TeVaultCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Mireles v. Deer Run Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. BD. OF TRUST. OF CITY OF EAGLE PASS v. Deer RunCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. City of Ranger v. Commission on Law Enforcement Officer StandardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Hager v. State Ex Rel. TeVaultCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API