Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Munoz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 14, 1966No. 20976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schauer.

The parties appear here in the same order as they appeared in the trial court and will be referred to accordingly, or by name. Humberto Munoz, husband of the defendant, was named in the complaint by virtue of the family car doctrine; however, his name does not appear in the evidence and will not be referred to herein.

Plaintiff in error seeks reversal of a judgment entered by the trial court on a verdict of a jury which found against the plaintiff on his complaint and against the defendant on her counterclaim, each claiming damages arising out of an automobile…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Buckskin Joe's, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Iacino v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. ShupeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. Eddy v. McAninchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Ridley v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Downing Ex Rel. Downing v. Overhead Door Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Davis v. ClineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Reid v. BerkowitzColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Kelley v. HolmesColorado Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API