Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest relates to merchandise, described on the invoice as “Plastic Stir Sticks” and classified by similitude in use to glass articles, not household articles, not specially provided for, under paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, and paragraph 1559(a), as amended, and assessed with duty at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem.
*248Plaintiff’s principal claim is for classification under the provision for non-enumerated manufactured articles in paragraph. 1558 of tlie Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, with a dutiable assessment at the rate of 10 per…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Salentine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Oviatt Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Simon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966