Davison Specialty Chemical Co. v. S & H Erectors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDGAR, District Judge.
This is an action premised upon an indemnity clause contained in a construction contract executed by the parties. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This matter is presently before the Court for consideration of the motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendant S & H Erectors, Inc.
On November 8, 1983, S & H Erectors, Inc. (hereinafter “S & H”) agreed to perform certain work for Davison Specialty Chemical Co. (hereinafter “Davison”) relating to the construction of an addition to the Davison facilities…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Boatland, Inc. And Robert L. Moore v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Crockett v. CrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Tennessee River Pulp and Paper Company, Third-Party v. Eichleay Corporation and Miller Electric Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vencor, Inc. v. Standard Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Scroggins v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Vencor, Inc. v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003