Legal Opinion

Davison Specialty Chemical Co. v. S & H Erectors, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 27, 1985No. Civ. 1-84-329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDGAR, District Judge.

This is an action premised upon an indemnity clause contained in a construction contract executed by the parties. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This matter is presently before the Court for consideration of the motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendant S & H Erectors, Inc.

On November 8, 1983, S & H Erectors, Inc. (hereinafter “S & H”) agreed to perform certain work for Davison Specialty Chemical Co. (hereinafter “Davison”) relating to the construction of an addition to the Davison facilities…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Boatland, Inc. And Robert L. Moore v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  4. Crockett v. CrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Tennessee River Pulp and Paper Company, Third-Party v. Eichleay Corporation and Miller Electric Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vencor, Inc. v. Standard Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Scroggins v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2000
  3. Vencor, Inc. v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API