Pennington Produce Co. v. Wonn
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
The special issues 1 and 3, respectively, are made the subject-matter of error in presuming negligence as a matter of pure law, and in not requiring of the jury the finding of negligence vel non in the circumstances. The evidence affirmatively showed that the truck was equipped with and carried for use a tail-light, but is conflicting as to whether or not it was kept lighted while the truck was standing on the highway at the time of the injury in suit. The sole disputed fact was that of whether or not the light was kept burning while the truck was parked. Issue No. 1 required a finding by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Horton v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Horton v. BensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BakerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Estes v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sproles v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. FoucheCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Western Development Corp. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Cree v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Swiff v. MichaelisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.