Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1882Published

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

Even under the old law, it was always held that the effect of an appeal from the judgment of a justice, rendered upon a defective service, was a full appearance and a waiver of all defects in process, or service of process. This appears not only from Ser v. Bobst (8 Mo. 506), but from all the later cases to which appellant calls our attention, especially from Blunt v. Railroad Company (55 Mo. 157). It is true that the supreme court held in some of these cases, and in the case just cited, that appellant might, in the appellate court, by motion, determine the purpose of the appeal; *462and that, if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schell v. LelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Jefferson City v. OpelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Ser v. BobstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
  4. Williams v. BowerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  5. Jordan v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API