Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Guardianship of Nathaniel C. Hurst, Centier Bank and Centier Bank, Personal Representative of the Estate of Luanne Hurst v. Nathaniel C. Hurst

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2018No. 45A03-1612-GU-2790PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robb, Judge.

[1] In Guardianship of Hurst , 84 N.E.3d 1222 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), Centier Bank (the "Bank") appealed the denial of its motion for summary judgment despite the fact the order it appealed was not a final judgment and it had not taken the appropriate steps to pursue a discretionary interlocutory appeal. We first considered whether we should decide the case on the merits or dismiss it as untimely. Based on several things: the general discussion in our supreme court's opinion in In re D.J. , 68 N.E.3d 574 (Ind. 2017) ; the supreme court's specific acknowledgement that Appellate Rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Adoption of O.R., N.R. v. K.G. and C.G.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In Re: The Matter of D.J. and G.J., Children in Need of Services Gr.J. (Mother) and J.J. (Father) v. Ind. Dept. of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Town of Ellettsville, Indiana Plan Commission and Richland Convenience Store Partners, LLC v. Joseph v. DeSpiritoIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Craig D. Severance and Catherine Severance v. The Pleasant View Homeowners Association, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Gerald F. Scott v. Cheryl Carrico (Dillman), Carla Cook (Dillman), and Rhonda K. VanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API