Legal Opinion

Price v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1909No. 1,660Published

Appeal from the United States Court for China.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This cause comes here from the United States Court for China, established by Act Cong. June 30, 1906, c. 3934, 34 Stat. 814 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 797), the third section of which act is as follows:

“That appeals shall lie from all final judgments or decrees of said court to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and thence appeals and writs of error may be taken from the judgments or decrees of the said Circuit Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court of the United States in the same class of cases as those in which appeals and writs of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mussina v. CavazosSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Bondurant v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Chase v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Ex Parte RalstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Bondurant, Tutrix v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API