Legal Opinion
2525 Ramona, LLC and Chula Vista Holistic Center, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 28, 2026No. 3:26-cv-02733Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 2525 RAMONA, LLC and CHULA Case No. 26-cv-02733-BAS-SBC VISTA HOLISTIC CENTER, INC., 12 ORDER: Plaintiffs, 13 (1) GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART 14 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 15 DISMISS (ECF No. 5); Defendant. 16 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 17 MOTION TO DROP CHULA 18 VISTA HOLISTIC CENTER, 19 INC. AS A PARTY (ECF No. 10) 20 21 Presently before the Court is Defendant Starbucks Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss 22 (“MTD”) (ECF No. 5). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and 23…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.