Legal Opinion
Saly v. Town of Kearny
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 9, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
85 N.J. Super. 586 (1964)
205 A.2d 475
JOSEPH SALY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWN OF KEARNY, NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County Court, Law Division.
Decided December 9, 1964.
Mr. Peter A. Adams for petitioner-respondent.
Mr. Robert J. McCurrie for respondent-appellant.
SCHULMAN, J.C.C.
This is a workmen's compensation case. Respondent town appealed from an order of the Division of Workmen's Compensation on three grounds: (1) the respondent-appellant is entitled to reimbursement under the reimbursement section of the Compensation Act under N.J.S.A. 34:15-40;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schwarz v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Betsy Ross Ice Cream Co. v. GreifSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Donoher v. American Steel Wire Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Swan v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF TEACHERS'PENSION FUNDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Detlefs v. Town of WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Ziegler v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Saly v. Town of KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966