Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1923No. Nos. 24,263, 24,264PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellants were separately charged by affidavit, tried and convicted in the court below of escaping from the State Farm, in violation of §1 of Acts 1915 p. 338, §2406a Burns' Supp. 1921. The separate motion of each for a new trial was overruled and judgment in accordance with the finding in each case. These cases were tried the same day, in the same court, before the same judge, and submitted on the same evidence.

Each of these appellants separately assigned error on the overruling of their separate motions for a new trial. Their only insistence here is that the evidence is insufficient to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shira v. State ex rel. HamIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Mercer v. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Rock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alex v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gallegos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Helton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Commonwealth v. MerandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API