Legal Opinion

Ben v. Schwartz

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1997No. 715 C.D. 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs (Bureau) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which dismissed Bureau’s motion to quash subpoena granted to Ewa Marta Ben (Ben) and Arthur T. Ben (collectively, Plaintiffs).

This case involves a malpractice action brought by Plaintiffs against Dr. Schwartz, Dr. DePancis and Suburban Dental Care. In their complaint, Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Schwartz, who practiced under the name Suburban Dental Care, provided negligent dental care to Ben…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Borden Company v. William Sylk and Harry S. Sylk v. Penrose Industries Corporation Sylvan Seal Milk, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Grinnell Corp. v. HackettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  3. Doe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Strain v. Simpson HouseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Der Laan v. Nazareth HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API