Legal Opinion

Martin v. Paddelford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendants, Jesse F. Paddelford and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Broome on the 26th day of June, 1917, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 6th day of July, 1917, denying defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The plaintiff, as the owner of nine separate claims for materials furnished and services rendered by various persons *355in connection with the performance by the defendants of a contract for highway improvement entered into by them with the State Highway Commission, brought this action, and recovered judgment thereupon. No question was made upon the trial as to the furnishing of the materials or the performance of the services. It was, however, in serious dispute whether any contracts for the materials and services were ever made with these defendants. The defendants contended…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fred W. Hoch Associates, Inc. v. Western Newspaper Union, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API