Legal Opinion
Supak v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 27, 1965No. 37287Published
1Opinion
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORRISON, Judge.
On rehearing appellant relies upon Henry v. State of Mississippi, 85 S.Ct. 564, 13 L.Ed.2d 408 (1965). We have concluded, however, that Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois, 359 U.S. 121, 79 S.Ct. 676, 3 L.Ed. 2d 684; Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729, and Hamilton v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 243, 29 S.W.2d 393, are here controlling.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930