Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Spencer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

This is an action for the reasonable value of labor and materials. The amended complaint alleges that, between November 16, 1946, and July 1, 1947, under employment by one C. B. Spencer, plaintiff installed certain electrical equipment in a building known as the Spencer Cannery, in Lebanon, Oregon; that his labor and materials were of the reasonable value of $1,710, which Spencer promised and agreed to pay, but did not; that Spencer died August 13,1947, and that defendant is the executrix of his will. Defendant answered by general denial.

There was a trial by jury, during the progress of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. Title & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Indian Ref. Co., Inc. v. Royal Oil Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Goldberg, Bowen & Co. v. DimickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Leonard v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Carver Sound Equipment Co. v. TonahillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Real Estate Loan Fund Oreg. Ltd. v. HevnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pokorny v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Cascade Warehouse Co. v. DyerOregon Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API