Legal Opinion

Bartley & Senters Coal Co. v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 29, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

One question is raised in this appeal: Was there sufficient evidence of substance to support the Workmen’s Compensation Board’s finding of fact that appellee-employee, Linzie H. Hall, was injuriously exposed to the hazard of silicosis while employed in a mine of appellant-employer, Bartley & Senters Coal Company, from April, 1960, until November, 1961 ? See KRS 342.316(12).

Appellee, testifying for himself, stated that appellant’s mine was not mechanized; that it utilized no cutting machine in extracting coal but that the coal was “shot from the solid”; that all the coal was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Prestonsburg v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Kentucky Power Company v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Walker v. Lebanon Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cornett v. Corbin Materials, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Rowe v. King-Darby Coals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API