Legal Opinion
State v. Mendoza, 08ap-645 (3-17-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 2009No. Nos. 08AP-645, 08AP-689PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Alfonso C. Mendoza and Michael O. Champagnie, appeal from the judgments of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding each defendant guilty of one count of possession of marijuana, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. Defendants together assign one error:
[I.] THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN IT OVERRULED APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS.
Mendoza also assigns a second error:
[II] THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY INDICATING THAT A "GUILTY" PLEA WAS ENTERED WHEN IN FACT, DEFENDANT ENTERED A "NO CONTEST" PLEA.
Because the trial court did not err in denying…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. PilgrimOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. WestoverOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. GoodloeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Upper Arlington v. WissingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.