Legal Opinion

Gaudiosi v. Gaudiosi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1985No. 84-2580PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The final judgment in this dissolution action required the husband to “pay one-half of the wife’s reasonable attorneys fees and costs” and reserved jurisdiction “to determine the amount ... at a subsequent hearing.” Notwithstanding the above, the court, at a later hearing, decided it had not retained jurisdiction to determine the amount. We disagree and reverse.

The confusion arises because of a third order which intervened between the final judgment and the order in which the court decided it had not retained jurisdiction. The intervening order awarded permanent alimony but did not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frumkes v. FrumkesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Barreiro v. BarreiroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Oyer v. BoyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Gonzalez v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Maney v. ManeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steinfeld v. SteinfeldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Cibula v. CibulaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API