People v. Pedro T.
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
*1053ARABIAN, J.
—I respectfully dissent. While I am as eager as the majority to deter criminal conduct, imposing on the minor a punishment the Legislature has since abandoned will not accomplish that end. Simply yet ineluctably, nothing can deter a crime already committed; neither can an obsolete punishment prevent future offenses. The Legislature has ended its experiment and allowed the increased penalty for first offense vehicle-taking to lapse, impliedly finding the more severe punishment inappropriate. Nevertheless, purporting to distinguish three decades of decisional authority, the majority…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.