Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Petroleum Geophysical Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1981No. 80-477PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Appeal by Petroleum Geophysical Company from a judgment awarding punitive damages in favor of Merle and Marie Dahl, based on a jury verdict rendered in the Fifteenth Judicial District, Sheridan County.

Merle and Marie Dahl (Dahl) sued Petroleum Geophysical Company (PGC) for damages claimed to have occurred to their farmlands when a seismograph hole drilled and “shot” by PGC brought a continuous water flow to the farm surface, which flow PGC failed to plug.

The Dahl complaint was in two counts for actual and punitive damages. The jury, on the submitted issue of comparative (called “contributory”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gallatin Trust and Savings Bank v. HenkeMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Sistok v. Northwestern Telephone Systems, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Holenstein v. AndrewsMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Miller v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Thomas v. MerriamMontana Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Tope v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Martin Development Co. v. Keeney Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. First Security Bank v. Income Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Flynn v. SirenMontana Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API