Legal Opinion
Cascade General, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1993No. 91-70547, 91-70605Published
1Opinion of the Court
9 F.3d 731
CASCADE GENERAL,* Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.
Nos. 91-70547, 91-70605.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 3, 1993.
Decided June 24, 1993.
As Amended Nov. 5, 1993.
Wayne D. Landsverk, Newcomb, Sabin, Schwartz & Landsverk, Portland, OR, for petitioner-respondent.
Fred L. Cornell, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent-petitioner.
Petition for Review & Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Before TANG, POOLE, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
TANG,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.