Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Instructions 25.9-25.13

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 18, 2013No. SC11-1010Published

1ConcurrencePariente, J.

I write in response to Justice Canady’s dissent that we should eliminate the instructions on reasonable doubt. Because this portion of the instructions is given only when an affirmative defense is raised, and because the instructions have been in place since 2007, after section 893.101, Florida Statutes, was enacted, I would not eliminate those instructions. See Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 25.2-25.16.

The Legislature enacted section 893.101 in 2002 to explicitly provide that knowledge of the illicit nature of the controlled substance is not a required element of a drug offense. Ch.2002-258,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. Chicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. In Re Standard Inst. in Crim. Cases (No. 2005-3)Supreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API