Legal Opinion

State v. Pill

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 31, 1965No. 2 CA-CR 4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Joseph R. Pill, aged 25, was charged with grand theft and passing a forged check. He was represented by counsel and, on December 31, 1963, entered a plea of guilty to each charge. Separate informations were filed as to each charge. Sentencing was set and duly held on January 7, 1964, in the Superior Court of Pima County, Honorable John F. Molloy presiding.

The defendant and his counsel, as well as a deputy county attorney and a court reporter, were present. The original reporter’s transcript of the proceedings at the time of sentencing was not included in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The People v. RileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. HuttonArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. FentonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. United Steelworkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. C. J. Huebel Co. v. MacKinnonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API