State v. . Maynor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
As no judgment of forfeiture or confiscation was entered at tbe trial term in tbe criminal prosecution, as required by tbe statutes on tbe subject, G. S., 18-48 and 18-6, it was proper to enter appropriate judgment therein nunc pro tunc at a later term. Ferrell v. Hales, 119 N. C., 199, 25 S. E., 821; McIntosh on Procedure, page 692, et seq. Moreover, a court has “tbe right to amend tbe records of any preceding term by inserting what has been omitted, either by tbe act of tbe Clerk or of tbe Court; and a record so-amended stands as if it bad never been defective, or as if tbe entry bad been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ferrell v. . HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- State v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- In Re State v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Motor Co. v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Shaver v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. VanhoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. O'HoraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.