Legal Opinion
Holbrook v. Smith & Hawken, Ltd.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 11, 2007No. Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-1232 (VLB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED AS COLLECTIVE ACTION [DOC. #18]
VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Kathleen Holbrook, brings this action against the defendant, Smith & Hawken, Ltd. (“Smith & Hawken”), her former employer, alleging Smith & Hawken failed to compensate her for overtime worked in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and the Connecticut Minimum Wage Act (“CMWA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 31-58, et seq. Holbrook now moves the court: (1) to proceed as a collective action pursuant to section…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Mooney v. Aramco Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Gjurovich v. Emmanuel's Marketplace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guillen v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Tice v. AOC Senior Home Health Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2011
- Walker v. HongHua America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Perkins v. Southern New England Telephone Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Greenstein v. Meredith Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.