Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Thorpe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 3, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Any written words which directly or indirectly charge a person with a crime, or which tend to injure his reputation in any other way, or to expose him to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule, are defamatory. Such words, if published without lawful excuse or justification, constitute a libel, and the-person in respect to whom .they are written may maintain an action for them without either alleging or proving special damages. Gi les v. Company, 69 N. H. 92; Palmer v. Concord, 48 N. H. 211; Newell S. & L. (2d ed.) 43-45. See, also, 18 Am. &- Eng. Enc. Law (2d ed.) 909, 914-916, where the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Lewiston Daily Sun Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  2. Crane v. DarlingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  3. Call v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Cook v. BostwickNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomson v. CashSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. Frese v. FormellaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  3. Aaron Harkaway v. Boston Herald Traveler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API