Legal Opinion

Langford v. Salter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. Where counsel acknowledges service upon a bill of exceptions, such acknowledgment shall be held to be a complete waiver of all defects in the service which the counsel signing it is legally competent to waive, unless counsel in the entry of acknowledgment distinctly and specifically states that it is not to be construed as waiving some particular defect then pointed out by him. Acts 1911, p. 150, sec. 4. The ruling in Inman v. Estes, 104 Ga. 645 (30 S. E. 800), is superseded by the act just cited. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is therefore overruled.

2. The allegations in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Inman, Smith & Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Majette v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Carnes v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Carnes v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API