Legal Opinion

Richter v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1927No. Appeal 8PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The question here involved is the proper construction of a contract of insurance against the effects of bodily injuries caused by accidental means. It arises through the filing, under section 20 of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, of an affidavit of defense raising questions of law. The material facts are not in dispute. On April 13, 1925, the appellee, Commonwealth Casualty Company, issued its policy to Otto Richter, in which his father, Hugo Richter, the appellant, was named as the beneficiary. On June 26, 1925, Otto Richter, while engaged in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. White v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Abbott's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plymouth Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Illinois Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company of Chicago, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Chambers v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Vernon v. Firemen's Pension FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Delaware County Construction Co. v. Safeguard InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Barnes v. North American Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API