Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. McCuller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2007No. Docket 128161Published

1DissentKelly, J.

This case presents the majority with the opportunity to correct an error. When the Court previously sat in judgment of this case, the majority found that no Sixth Amendment1 violation had *699occurred at defendant’s sentencing. It sanctioned the judge’s fact-finding that increased defendant’s sentence by moving it from an intermediate sanction cell to a straddle cell. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the decision, and remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of its most recent Sixth Amendment precedent, Cunningham, v California, 549 US 127 S Ct…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API