Jones v. State

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor and of maintaining a common nuisance in violation of §§4 and 24, Acts 1925 p. 144, §§2717 and 2740 Burns 1926.

The error assigned is the overruling of his motion for a new trial, under which it is contended that: (1) The verdict is contrary to law; (2) that there was error in admitting certain evidence; and (3) in overruling a motion to direct verdict for appellant.

In support of. the contention that the verdict is contrary to law, appellant states three abstract propositions of law, without any attempt being made to apply…