Legal Opinion

Kincannon v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 2004No. CA CR 03-237PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Gloria Kincannon appeals from her conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. She asserts that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of a confidential informant as a rebuttal witness and that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a bag of methamphetamine because the State failed to establish the chain of custody of the evidence. We agree that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of the confidential informant; therefore, we reverse and remand.

Appellant’s trial was conducted on October 7, 2002. The charges were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Isbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Crisco v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Guydon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Hajek-McClure v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Swanigan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Jackson v. State.1Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API