Legal Opinion

Virginia Land Co. v. Haupt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 8, 1894PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to judgment of circuit court of city of Roanoke, rendered at its January term, 1893, in an action at law wherein the Virginia Land Company was plaintiff and S. B. Haupt was defendant. The judgment being adverse to the plaintiff company, it appealed. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error was sued by the Virginia Land Company to recover certain unpaid assessments on the capital stock of the company, aggregating $2,800. The principal grounds of defence were (1) Fraud in the procuring the contract of subscription; and (2) a material variance between the prospectus and the charter of the company. The jury found for the defendant, and the court refused to disturb the verdict.

The defendant, subscribed to the stock at the instance of one O’Leary, who was a real estate agent at Roanoke and one of the promoters of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bosher v. R. & H. Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  2. Crump v. United States Mining CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  3. Norwich Lock Manufacturing Co. v. HookadaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1893

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Martin v. South Salem Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Heckscher v. . EdenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Stone v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Zang v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API