Legal Opinion

Alexander Gul v. City of Bloomington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2014No. 53A04-1408-MI-1428PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

“Her lawn

Looks like a meadow,

And if she mows the place

She leaves the clover standing

And the Queen Anne’s Lace!” 1

“The grass may be greener on the other side of the fence but you still have to mow it.” 2

Alexander Gul believes that modern day lawn maintenance practices are harmful to the environment. As a result, he refuses to mow his lawn to comply with an ordinance requiring that the height of grass in one’s yard may not exceed eight inches. He appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Bloomington (Bloomington) on Gul’s complaint…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Abernathy v. GuldenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Kent W. Abernathy, Commissioner of the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles and Bernard Carter, Prosecuting Attorney for Lake County v. Eric C. Gulden, Jeremy Crawford, David J. KlahnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Marcius Strawhorn and HSD of Central Indiana, LLC v. Town of Hillsboro, Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API