Legal Opinion

Kilpatrick v. Pickett

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1975No. 12504PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENNIS, Judge.

The appellant in this case, Travis H. Kilpatrick, is seeking a declaratory judgment against his grandchildren decreeing that they cannot represent their deceased *674father in the succession of their grandmother, Edith Lusk Kilpatrick. The court below sustained defendants’ exception of no cause of action. The case hinges ultimately on the question of whether, in a civil suit, a person may be “convicted of having killed . . . the deceased” as provided by Civil Code Article 966, in order to have him declared an unworthy heir.

The facts alleged in the petition are: Edith Lusk Kilpatrick…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Succession of MedicaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. California-Western States Life Insurance v. SanfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981
  2. Kilpatrick v. PickettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API