Legal Opinion
Jim Crockett Promotion, Inc. v. City of Charlotte
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1983No. 82-1554PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a grant of a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of certain specific sections of the Charlotte, (North Carolina) Noise Ordinance.1 In so doing, the District Court found two sections (§§ 13-53.1 and 13-52) of the Ordinance facially unconstitutional for vagueness and a third (§ 13-55.1) unconstitutional because it “place[d] an unconstitutional burden upon the defendant to prove freedom from guilt.” The defendant City of Charlotte and its individual officers have appealed. We affirm in part and reverse in part, 538 F.Supp. 1197.
I
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- López v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- Morales v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Fratiello v. MancusoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1987
- Amico v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Harris v. LukhardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.