Matter of New York Edison Co. v. Maltbie
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We agree with the Appellate Division in its construction of the orders of the Public Service Commission. On that construction, the orders were more than general administrative or legislative rules. They directly interfered with private property rights of these respondents. Such an order may be made only after a hearing and, since it involves a judicial act, is subject to review on certiorari.
Nothing here decided limits the power of the Commission to prescribe uniform methods of keeping accounts, records and books. (Public Service Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 48], § 66, subd. 4.) Under that power, all…
2Cited by38 opinions
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lakeland Water District v. Onondaga County Water AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Public Service Co. v. New HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.