Southeastern General Corp. v. Gorff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HOBSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of the appellee based upon a jury verdict.
We have carefully reviewed the record and find that the verdict of the jury is supported therein by competent substantial evidence which accords with logic and reason. Although it is true there is conflicting testimony, the jury has resolved these conflicts in favor of the appellee and, therefore, we are precluded from substituting our judgment for that of the jury.
The appellant has assigned as error the denial of the trial court to include in its instructions to the jury its requested…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. PickardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Gates & Sons, Inc. v. BrockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Potetti ex rel. Potetti v. Ben Lil, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. LanteriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.