Legal Opinion

Shay v. Mullen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peters, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to prohibit respondent from entering an order of dismissal or other sanction in connection with a particular criminal action.

Thomas E. Ottenschot was indicted for two counts of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as a felony (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]), and for speeding (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180 [b]). In response to a defense motion requesting, inter alia, access to the breathalyzer used to test the blood alcohol level of defendant,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Constantine v. LetoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Constantine v. LetoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. LaingNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ChavezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Phillips v. RamseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Matter of Clark v. NewbauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Brown v. SchulmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. State v. ChavezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API