Legal Opinion

Shazel v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1998PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYLE REID, Special Judge.

This case presents for review the decision by the Court of Criminal Appeals that the defendant, who absconded and intentionally failed to appear at the hearing on his motion to set aside a plea of guilty, is entitled to post-conviction relief because he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The decision is reversed, and the petition for post-conviction relief is denied.

I

The petitioner, Calvin Shazel, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of aggravated robbery, pursuant to a plea agreement whereby the petitioner would receive a Range I sentence and a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bradford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. French v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Von Schounmacher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  3. Bernard Woodard v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  4. Brad Everett Jones v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. Carl Johnson v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API