Legal Opinion

Licursi v. Sweeney

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 1, 1991No. 90-546 and 90-547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendant David J. Sweeney appeals from the denial by Lamoille Superior Court of his motion to dissolve an attachment obtained by plaintiff in post-judgment trustee process against assets of defendant held by Home Insurance Company. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

In 1985, plaintiff obtained a foreclosure decree, granting her title to property that had been mortgaged to defendant and awarding judgment for attorney’s fees and court costs in the amount of $3,502.59. In 1990, plaintiff served a motion for post- judgment trustee process on the Home Insurance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Robinson/Keir PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Texas Consumer Finance Corp. v. First National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Hooper, Tr. in Bankruptcy v. KennedySupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  5. Webster v. OrneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. HaasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Landry v. LandrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. In Re ChristieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1992
  4. Ronald Geraw v. Pamela GerawSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API