Legal Opinion

Halliday v. Barber

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 1, 1902Published

Appear from order overruling amended answer as frivolous, and from judgment entered thereon. ✓

1Opinion of the CourtHasgarr, J.

The only question, it seems to us, presented • for determination is whether the amended answer is frivolous within the meaning of the Code, and the decisions enlarging upon the same.

Whatever agreement may or may not have been made by the parties, subsequent to the execution of the written lease, it became the right of defendant to have his sworn allegations passed upon by a jury, as questions of fact, however improbable these allegations may appear. The various matters set up, if true, would tend to establish a set-off against plaintiff’s claim. It is not whether a demurrer would lie, but…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eppens, Smith & Wiemann Co. v. LittlejohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API